<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Clinical Lawyer</title>
	<link>http://clinicallawyer.com/files</link>
	<description>Where the law meets mental health practice</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 20:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>So You&#8217;ve Been Asked to Write a Declaration&#8230;&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://clinicallawyer.com/files/2008/03/06/so-youve-been-asked-to-write-a-declaration/</link>
		<comments>http://clinicallawyer.com/files/2008/03/06/so-youve-been-asked-to-write-a-declaration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 01:24:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clinical Lawyer</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Legal Basics</category>
	<category>Practice Management</category>
	<category>Forensic Practice</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clinicallawyer.com/files/2008/03/06/so-youve-been-asked-to-write-a-declaration/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The question of what to do when asked to author or sign a declaration on behalf of a patient is a stressful dilemma for most practitioners.  This usually occurs  when a patient is in the midst of litigation and the patient or the patient&#8217;s attorney believes that a statement from the practitioner would [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://clinicallawyer.com/files/2008/03/06/so-youve-been-asked-to-write-a-declaration/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Psychotherapist-Patient Privilege for Private Sex Offender Treatment?</title>
		<link>http://clinicallawyer.com/files/2008/02/22/psychotherapist-patient-privilege-for-private-sex-offender-treatment/</link>
		<comments>http://clinicallawyer.com/files/2008/02/22/psychotherapist-patient-privilege-for-private-sex-offender-treatment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 18:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clinical Lawyer</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Legal Basics</category>
	<category>Miscellaneous</category>
	<category>Forensic Practice</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clinicallawyer.com/files/2008/02/22/psychotherapist-patient-privilege-for-private-sex-offender-treatment/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On February 20th, 2008, the Court of Appeal of the state of California, Second Appellate District, published an opinion in the nature of the psychotherapist-patient privilege for convicted sex offenders undergoing voluntary psychotherapy.
The question the court faced was this: if a convicted sex offender (SO) is required to undergo psychotherapy as a part of his/her [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://clinicallawyer.com/files/2008/02/22/psychotherapist-patient-privilege-for-private-sex-offender-treatment/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Those Confidentiality Disclaimers At The End Of Your Email&#8230;&#8230;..</title>
		<link>http://clinicallawyer.com/files/2007/07/31/those-confidentiality-disclaimers-at-the-end-of-your-email/</link>
		<comments>http://clinicallawyer.com/files/2007/07/31/those-confidentiality-disclaimers-at-the-end-of-your-email/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 01:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clinical Lawyer</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Legal Basics</category>
	<category>Practice Management</category>
	<category>Forensic Practice</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clinicallawyer.com/files/2007/07/31/those-confidentiality-disclaimers-at-the-end-of-your-email/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Huge numbers of clinicians have disclaimers at the end of email messages that say something like this:
&#8220;The information contained in this email is CONFIDENTIAL.  If you have received this message in error or without the express direction of the original author, please notify the sender and delete this email immediately.&#8221;
But what does that mean? [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://clinicallawyer.com/files/2007/07/31/those-confidentiality-disclaimers-at-the-end-of-your-email/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HIPAA: Once a covered entity, always a covered entity?</title>
		<link>http://clinicallawyer.com/files/2007/06/16/hipaa-once-a-covered-entity-always-a-covered-entity/</link>
		<comments>http://clinicallawyer.com/files/2007/06/16/hipaa-once-a-covered-entity-always-a-covered-entity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2007 22:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clinical Lawyer</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Legal Basics</category>
	<category>Miscellaneous</category>
	<category>Practice Management</category>
	<category>Forensic Practice</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clinicallawyer.com/files/2007/06/16/hipaa-once-a-covered-entity-always-a-covered-entity/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rightly or wrongly, HIPAA is perceived by many clinicians as an administrative nightmare.  For those who aren&#8217;t already compliant, the task of becoming HIPAA compliant isn&#8217;t one that clinicians relish.  Most clinicians who have practices that need to be HIPAA compliant accomplished this task a long time ago.
For those who/that are covered entities, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://clinicallawyer.com/files/2007/06/16/hipaa-once-a-covered-entity-always-a-covered-entity/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Juvenile Incompetency to Stand Trial: can it be based on developmental immaturity?</title>
		<link>http://clinicallawyer.com/files/2007/05/11/juvenile-incompetency-to-stand-trial-can-it-be-based-on-developmental-immaturity/</link>
		<comments>http://clinicallawyer.com/files/2007/05/11/juvenile-incompetency-to-stand-trial-can-it-be-based-on-developmental-immaturity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 15:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clinical Lawyer</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Forensic Practice</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clinicallawyer.com/files/2007/05/11/juvenile-incompetency-to-stand-trial-can-it-be-based-on-developmental-immaturity/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On May 10th, 2007, the California Court of Appeal for the Third Appellate District addressed the longstanding question of whether juvenile respondents may be found incompetent to stand trial based upon age-related developmental immaturity, or whether such a finding must be predicated on a &#8220;mental disorder&#8221; or developmental disability.  It is a decision that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://clinicallawyer.com/files/2007/05/11/juvenile-incompetency-to-stand-trial-can-it-be-based-on-developmental-immaturity/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.407 seconds -->
