On May 10th, 2007, the California Court of Appeal for the Third Appellate District addressed the longstanding question of whether juvenile respondents may be found incompetent to stand trial based upon age-related developmental immaturity, or whether such a finding must be predicated on a “mental disorder” or developmental disability. It is a decision that draws heavily on developmental research, due process, and criminal procedure. It is well worth the read for clinicians and attorneys who work in juvenile proceedings.
The decision can be found here: In re Timothy J..
Be sure to keep an eye out for future developments and decisions.
Thanks to Dr. Paul Mattuizzi for originally posting about this case.
IMPORTANT: This website is for basic information only. Nothing in this website should be construed to be formal legal advice, nor does it create an attorney-client relationship. Please see the “Important Information” page at the top of the screen.
THANKS A LOT. IT HAS BEEN VERY HELPFUL TO READ DATA PROVIDED…INASMUCH AS I CONDUCT FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENTS WITH JUVENILES.